mcp-pinecone — security grade SAFE, quality 75/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 75/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by sirmews · MCP Server · ★ 149

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is mcp-pinecone safe to install? View the security audit →

About mcp-pinecone

Pinecone Model Context Protocol Server for Claude Desktop. Read and write to a Pinecone index. Components mermaid flowchart TB subgraph Client["MCP Client (e.g., Claude Desktop)"] UI[User Interface] end subgraph MCPServer["MCP Server (pinecone-mcp)"] Server[Server Class] subgraph Handlers["Request Handlers"] ListRes[listresources] ReadRes[readresource] ListTools[listtools] CallTool[calltool] GetPrompt[getprompt] ListPrompts[listprompts] end subgraph Tools["Implemented Tools"] SemSearch[semantic-search] ReadDoc[read-document] ListDocs[list-documents] PineconeStats[pinecone-stats] ProcessDoc[process-document] end end subgraph PineconeService["Pinecone Service"] PC[Pinecone Client] subgraph PineconeFunctions["Pinecone Operations"] Search[searchrecords] Upsert[upsertrecords] Fetch[fetchrecords] List[listrecords] Embed[generateembeddings] end Index[(Pinecone Index)] end %% Connections UI -- Server Server -- Handlers

claudemcpmcp-servermodel-context-protocolpineconerag

Quick Facts

Stars149
Forks34
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score75.3977114651218/100
Open Issues6
Last Updated2025-01-31
Created2024-12-08
Platformsclaude-code, mcp, python
Est. Tokens~7k

mcp-pinecone alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a mcp-pinecone alternative? If you're comparing mcp-pinecone with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • maverick-mcp by wshobson · ⭐ 668

    MaverickMCP - Personal Stock Analysis MCP Server

  • vestige by samvallad33 · ⭐ 628

    Cognitive Deterministic Memory Security OS for Agentic AI. Deterministic root-cause retrieval that reaches bac

  • Mantic.sh by marcoaapfortes · ⭐ 555

    A structural code search engine for Al agents.

  • XMem by XortexAI · ⭐ 233

    Xmem is a India's First open source multi-modal, multi-agentic long‑term memory layer for AI agents.

  • Axon.MCP.Server by ali-kamali · ⭐ 167

    Transform your codebase into an intelligent knowledge base for AI-powered development with Cursor IDE, Google

  • pluggedin-app by VeriTeknik · ⭐ 103

    The Crossroads for AI Data Exchanges. A unified, self-hostable web interface for discovering, configuring, and

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is mcp-pinecone?

mcp-pinecone is Model Context Protocol server to allow for reading and writing from Pinecone. Rudimentary RAG. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 149 GitHub stars.

What programming language is mcp-pinecone written in?

mcp-pinecone is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as claude, mcp, mcp-server.

How do I install or use mcp-pinecone?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the mcp-pinecone GitHub repository at github.com/sirmews/mcp-pinecone. The project has 149 stars and 34 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does mcp-pinecone use?

mcp-pinecone is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to mcp-pinecone?

The top alternatives to mcp-pinecone on Agent Skills Hub include maverick-mcp, vestige, Mantic.sh. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools