by sodam-ai · MCP Server · ★ 16
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 16 |
| Forks | 3 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 53/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-11 |
| Created | 2026-07-03 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~13k |
Claude Code 플러그인 — 웹사이트 SEO/GEO 진단(크롤·렌더·CWV·구조화데이터·AI크롤러정책·회귀감지) + GSC/GA4/PSI 연동. Next.js 프로젝트 승인 기반 자동수정(canonical·OG·noindex·robots·JSON-LD·제목·메타설명) + GitHub 저장소 PR 제안(실험적)
These tools work well together with SoDam-SeoMedic for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a SoDam-SeoMedic alternative? If you're comparing SoDam-SeoMedic with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Headless MCP server for Screaming Frog SEO Spider – run crawls, export and analyze crawl data via the CLI. Sma
Local citation-backed recall for Pi, OMP, Claude Code, Codex, and ChatGPT history.
Claude Code plugin that tells you why your site won't get cited by AI — and fixes the discoverability files au
Local-first AI knowledge layer. Extract architecture, query from any AI tool via MCP. Private by architecture.
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: