by suyoumo · Codex Skill · ★ 829
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 829 |
| Forks | 54 |
| Language | Rust |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-25 |
| Created | 2025-03-02 |
| Platforms | rust |
| Est. Tokens | ~23k |
ClawProBench Transparent live-first benchmark harness for evaluating model capability inside the OpenClaw runtime. 102 active scenarios, 162 catalog scenarios, deterministic grading, and OpenClaw-native coverage. ClawProBench focuses on real OpenClaw execution with deterministic grading, structured reports, and benchmark-profile selection.
Looking for a ClawProBench alternative? If you're comparing ClawProBench with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Claw-Eval is an evaluation harness for evaluating LLM as agents. All tasks verified by humans.
Awesome-LLM-Eval: a curated list of tools, datasets/benchmark, demos, leaderboard, papers, docs and models, ma
Paper trading simulator for Polymarket
A Go framework for building production agent systems with graph workflows, tools, memory, A2A, AG-UI, MCP, eva
OpenJudge: A Unified Framework for Holistic Evaluation and Quality Rewards
[ICLR'25] BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation Towards AGI
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: