video-shotcraft — security grade SAFE, quality 57/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 57/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by syklayou-glitch · Agent Tool · ★ 7

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is video-shotcraft safe to install? View the security audit →

About video-shotcraft

An AI agent skill for crafting cinematic product videos with Remotion: 152 shot recipe cards, 2.5D camera moves, beat-synced cuts, and film-grade SFX.

Quick Facts

Stars7
Forks2
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseApache-2.0
Quality Score56.899970175744/100
Last Updated2026-08-26
Created2026-08-26
Platformsnode
Est. Tokens~17k

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is video-shotcraft?

video-shotcraft is An AI agent skill for crafting cinematic product videos with Remotion: 152 shot recipe cards, 2.5D camera moves, beat-synced cuts, and film-grade SFX.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 7 GitHub stars.

What programming language is video-shotcraft written in?

video-shotcraft is primarily written in TypeScript.

How do I install or use video-shotcraft?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the video-shotcraft GitHub repository at github.com/syklayou-glitch/video-shotcraft. The project has 7 stars and 2 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does video-shotcraft use?

video-shotcraft is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools