cost-xray — security grade SAFE, quality 74/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 74/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by tigerless-labs · Codex Skill · ★ 629

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is cost-xray safe to install? View the security audit →

About cost-xray

cost-xray See what your AI coding agent actually sends to the API — and what each part costs. Most usage tools read local logs. That shows the total cost of a call or session, but it misses the request-time context assembled before the model is invoked: system prompts, tool schemas, MCP blocks, tool results, cache reads/writes, and previous thinking blocks. cost-xray captures the actual local API traffic for Claude Code and Codex, then attributes tokens and dollars back to the sources inside the request. It shows not just how much a turn cost, but why it cost that much. Home — every session by agent · project · session, with token and dollar totals Drill a session — context-win

claude-codecodex-clicost-trackingobservabilityprompt-cachingproxytoken-counting

Quick Facts

Stars629
Forks80
LanguagePython
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score73.6063391963271/100
Open Issues3
Last Updated2026-09-01
Created2026-06-06
Platformsclaude-code, cli, codex, python
Est. Tokens~16k

cost-xray alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a cost-xray alternative? If you're comparing cost-xray with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • inferock-bench by inferock · ⭐ 139

    Local LLM cost-tracking proxy for OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, and pinned OpenRouter calls with token usage, fai

  • clawmetry by vivekchand · ⭐ 414

    See your agent think. Zero-config observability & governance for 30 AI agent runtimes: Claude Code, OpenAI Cod

  • ai-observer by tobilg · ⭐ 265

    Unified local observability for AI coding assistants

  • platform by agynio · ⭐ 228

    Agyn is an open-source Kubernetes-native runtime that moves AI agents like Claude Code and Codex from laptops

  • toktrack by mag123c · ⭐ 189

    Ultra-fast token & cost tracker for LLM Token Usage (e.g. Claude Code)

  • multi-agent-ralph-loop by alfredolopez80 · ⭐ 146

    Autonomous orchestration framework for Claude Code with MemPalace-inspired memory (4-layer stack, 818-token wa

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is cost-xray?

cost-xray is See what Claude Code and Codex actually send to the API — and what each part costs.. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 629 GitHub stars.

What programming language is cost-xray written in?

cost-xray is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as claude-code, codex-cli, cost-tracking.

How do I install or use cost-xray?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the cost-xray GitHub repository at github.com/tigerless-labs/cost-xray. The project has 629 stars and 80 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does cost-xray use?

cost-xray is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to cost-xray?

The top alternatives to cost-xray on Agent Skills Hub include inferock-bench, clawmetry, ai-observer. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools