sage — security grade SAFE, quality 63/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 63/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by usetig · Codex Skill · ★ 105

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is sage safe to install? View the security audit →

About sage

Sage Sage is like a senior engineer that watches your coding agent's every move. Unlike existing review tools, Sage doesn't just look at code — it critiques your agent's responses, reasoning, and plans so you can catch issues before they're implemented. Table of Contents Demo Why current code review tools fall short Automating model cross-checking How It Works Setup Empirical Benefits Roadmap Troubleshooting Architecture Known Limitations Who are we Contributing License Demo Why current code review tools fall short AI review tools like Greptile and CodeRabbit are excellent at catching syntax errors, edge cases, and security issues. However, they only review code diffs and have no context on the AI conversation that produced them. When you're coding with AI you might spend 80% of your time planning and discussing approaches with

ai-agentsanthropicclaude-codeclaude-code-hooksclicode-reviewcode-reviewscoderabbitcodexcoding-agents

Quick Facts

Stars105
Forks8
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryCodex Skill
Quality Score62.7964767853966/100
Open Issues5
Last Updated2026-04-28
Created2025-10-24
Platformsclaude-code, cli, codex, gemini, node
Est. Tokens~485k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with sage for enhanced workflows:

  • qwen_cli_coder — semantic(0.17)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (60%)
  • genie — semantic(0.25)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (58%)
  • claude-skills — semantic(0.23)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (57%)

sage alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a sage alternative? If you're comparing sage with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • holysheep-cli by holysheep123 · ⭐ 292

    🐑 One command to configure all AI coding tools — Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, Aider & more

  • hcom by aannoo · ⭐ 490

    Let AI agents message, watch, and spawn each other across terminals. Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI, Curs

  • agent-skills by jdrhyne · ⭐ 241

    A collection of AI agent skills for Clawdbot, Claude Code, Codex

  • cortex-tms by cortex-tms · ⭐ 181

    The Universal AI-Optimized Project Boilerplate. A Tiered Memory System (TMS) designed to maximize AI agent per

  • flowlens-mcp-server by magentic · ⭐ 110

    FlowLens is an open-source MCP server that gives your coding agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Codex) full

  • vsync by nicepkg · ⭐ 55

    Sync MCP servers, Skills, Agents & Commands across Claude Code, Cursor, OpenCode, Codex. One config, all tools

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is sage?

sage is An LLM council that reviews your coding agent's every move. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 105 GitHub stars.

What programming language is sage written in?

sage is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as ai-agents, anthropic, claude-code.

How do I install or use sage?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the sage GitHub repository at github.com/usetig/sage. The project has 105 stars and 8 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to sage?

The top alternatives to sage on Agent Skills Hub include holysheep-cli, hcom, agent-skills. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools