by whillhill · MCP Server · ★ 427
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
English | 简体中文 mcpstore MCP management built with Rust Why mcpstore mcpstore is built with
| Stars | 427 |
| Forks | 34 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 58.3691957436363/100 |
| Open Issues | 7 |
| Last Updated | 2026-03-12 |
| Created | 2025-06-10 |
| Platforms | cli, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~481k |
Looking for a mcpstore alternative? If you're comparing mcpstore with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Elegantly manage your MCP services
MCP Server Framework and Tool Development library for building custom capabilities into agents.
MCP Playbooks for AI agents
MCP Playbooks for AI agents
Remote MCP Server that securely connects Enterprise context with your LLM, IDE, or agent platform of choice.
An MCP client for Neovim that seamlessly integrates MCP servers into your editing workflow with an intuitive i
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
mcpstore is 开盒即用的优雅管理mcp服务 | 结合Agent框架 | 作者听劝 | 已发布pypi | Vue页面demo. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 427 GitHub stars.
mcpstore is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as fastmcp, mcp, mcp-client.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the mcpstore GitHub repository at github.com/whillhill/mcpstore. The project has 427 stars and 34 forks, indicating an active community.
mcpstore is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to mcpstore on Agent Skills Hub include mcpstore, arcade-mcp, director. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: