Flagged: sudo usage. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
by wiltonesten-web · Codex Skill · ★ 48
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is codeximage-to-editable-ppt-v1 safe to install? View the security audit →
将基于图片的 PPT/PPTX 幻灯片重建为可编辑的 PPT演示文稿，分v1节省token版和v2高精度版。本skill属于v1节省token版
| Stars | 48 |
| Forks | 5 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 57.4795756475969/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-09 |
| Created | 2026-07-07 |
| Platforms | codex, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
Looking for a codeximage-to-editable-ppt-v1 alternative? If you're comparing codeximage-to-editable-ppt-v1 with other codex skill tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A Codex/Claude skill that maintains per-repo operating theory documents.
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
codeximage-to-editable-ppt-v1 is 将基于图片的 PPT/PPTX 幻灯片重建为可编辑的 PPT演示文稿，分v1节省token版和v2高精度版。本skill属于v1节省token版. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 48 GitHub stars.
codeximage-to-editable-ppt-v1 is primarily written in Python.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the codeximage-to-editable-ppt-v1 GitHub repository at github.com/wiltonesten-web/codeximage-to-editable-ppt-v1. The project has 48 stars and 5 forks, indicating an active community.
codeximage-to-editable-ppt-v1 is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to codeximage-to-editable-ppt-v1 on Agent Skills Hub include theorist. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: