jev-security-scan — security grade SAFE, quality 60/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 60/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by win4r · MCP Server · ★ 12

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is jev-security-scan safe to install? View the security audit →

About jev-security-scan

使用 TypeSafe Jev 审查 Skill 与 MCP 可疑行为 | Review Agent Skills and MCP code with Jev, static evidence, and explicit coverage gaps

Quick Facts

Stars12
Forks1
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score59.9815173442794/100
Last Updated2026-09-19
Created2026-09-19
Platformsmcp, python
Est. Tokens~5k

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is jev-security-scan?

jev-security-scan is 使用 TypeSafe Jev 审查 Skill 与 MCP 可疑行为 | Review Agent Skills and MCP code with Jev, static evidence, and explicit coverage gaps. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 12 GitHub stars.

What programming language is jev-security-scan written in?

jev-security-scan is primarily written in Python.

How do I install or use jev-security-scan?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the jev-security-scan GitHub repository at github.com/win4r/jev-security-scan. The project has 12 stars and 1 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does jev-security-scan use?

jev-security-scan is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools