by xinnan-tech · MCP Server · ★ 11.2k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 11,173 |
| Forks | 3,805 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 62/100 |
| Open Issues | 744 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-05 |
| Created | 2025-02-02 |
| Platforms | mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
小智后端服务xiaozhi-esp32-server 本项目基于人机共生智能理论和技术研发智能终端软硬件体系为开源智能硬件项目 xiaozhi-esp32提供后端服务 根据小智通信协议使用Python、Java、Vue实现 支持MQTT+UDP协议、Websocket协议、MCP接入点、声纹识别、知识库 常见问题 · 反馈问题 · 部署文档 · 更新日志
These tools work well together with xiaozhi-esp32-server for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a xiaozhi-esp32-server alternative? If you're comparing xiaozhi-esp32-server with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Open-source AI assistant ecosystem with MCP integrations, multimodal workflows, IoT support, and cross-platfor
Chrome DevTools for coding agents
The Open-Source Multimodal AI Agent Stack: Connecting Cutting-Edge AI Models and Agent Infra
GitHub's official MCP Server
A powerful MCP toolkit for coding, providing semantic retrieval and editing capabilities - the IDE for your a
An autonomous agent that conducts deep research on any data using any LLM providers
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: