by xxynet · Codex Skill · ★ 81
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 81 |
| Forks | 21 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | AGPL-3.0 |
| Quality Score | 63/100 |
| Open Issues | 19 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-06 |
| Created | 2025-10-31 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
✨ KiraAI Light up the digital soul English | 简体中文 🧭 Documentation KiraAI, a modular, multi-platform AI digital life that connects various AI models (LLM, TTS, STT, image/video generation, etc.) and chat platforms (QQ, Telegram, WeChat, Discord, Bilibili, etc.) with a digital life centered architecture.
Looking for a KiraAI alternative? If you're comparing KiraAI with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
KiraAI, a modular, multi-platform AI digital life that connects Large Language Models (LLMs) and various chat
Any Agent × Any Provider × Anywhere. Connect Cursor, Claude Code, OpenCode, or Codex to Slack, Telegram, Disco
QQ bot platform with cognitive memory architecture and multi-agent Skills, via OneBot V11.
MCP Server for Telegram
[archived] c4 GenAI Suite
AI-native TypeScript bot framework — one codebase for 20+ chat platforms (QQ, Discord, Telegram, Slack, WeChat
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: