by yihong1120 · MCP Server · ★ 351
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Flagged: sudo usage. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 351 |
| Forks | 47 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | AGPL-3.0 |
| Quality Score | 66/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-29 |
| Created | 2024-01-02 |
| Platforms | mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
🇬🇧 English | 🇹🇼 繁體中文 Construction Hazard Detection Server API | MCP Server | FCM Notification Server | Violation Records Server | Web BFF | Flutter App | Data Management Server | Streaming Web | Data Augmentation | Evaluation | Train <a href="https://fastapi.
These tools work well together with Construction-Hazard-Detection for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a Construction-Hazard-Detection alternative? If you're comparing Construction-Hazard-Detection with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🌟 A curated collection of free, high quality AI tools 🤖, APIs 🔗, datasets 📊, and learning resources 📚 cov
🤖 Automatically collected AI repos, tools, websites, papers & tutorials. 实用AI百宝箱 💎
A modern template for agentic orchestration — built for rapid iteration and scalable deployment using highly c
irresponsible innovation. Try now at https://chat.dev/
An MCP server providing tools for image processing operations
Open-source calculator for LLM system requirements.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: