by yogirk · Codex Skill · ★ 91
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
npx cliagent-council
git clone https://github.com/yogirk/agent-council.gitTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 91 |
| Forks | 22 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 71/100 |
| Open Issues | 5 |
| Last Updated | 2026-04-07 |
| Created | 2026-03-29 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, gemini, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~13k |
Agent Council Convene a panel of CLI-based AI agents to deliberate on your questions. Three models answer independently, review each other's work, and the invoking agent synthesizes the verdict as chairman. Works with Claude Code, Codex CLI, and Gemini CLI. Whichever tool you invoke from becomes the chairman. The others are council members.
Looking for a agent-council alternative? If you're comparing agent-council with other codex skill tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A Codex/Claude skill that maintains per-repo operating theory documents.
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: