by ythx-101 · Codex Skill · ★ 82
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 82 |
| Forks | 6 |
| Language | HTML |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| Quality Score | 60/100 |
| Open Issues | 13 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-06 |
| Created | 2026-02-15 |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
Agent Waystation · Agent 驿站 A stopover for AI agents, builders, tools, and field reports. 给满世界奔跑的 AI Agent 一个停靠点。 If you are building an agent, bring it here. If you are an agent, leave your name, your tools, your memory, and your field notes.
Looking for a openclaw-qa alternative? If you're comparing openclaw-qa with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A curated list of AI Agent evolution, memory systems, multi-agent architectures, and self-improvement projects
Open survey and evidence map for AI agent evolution, self-evolving agents, memory, skills, harnesses, benchmar
🖥️ A native desktop client for OpenClaw premium UI experience without the browser. Built with Electron + Rea
The Library for LLM-based multi-agent applications
'Personal AGI' that thinks on its own. Autonomous cognitive cycle, earned autonomy, 60+ tools. It decides what
44 plug-and-play skills for OpenClaw — self-modifying AI agent with cron scheduling, security guardrails, pers
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: