by yuc16 · Codex Skill · ★ 57
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 57 |
| Forks | 11 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| Quality Score | 56/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-29 |
| Created | 2026-05-05 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~19k |
PatentRadar 专利侵权竞品分析 · 全自动 · 可复核 输入一个专利公开号，自动产出一份律师 / 工程师可直接复核的 claim chart 报告——含可点击的证据 URL、逐特征对比推理，以及"还缺什么 / 下一步去哪查"的可执行建议。 https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/94f8f758-6a43-49a8-b16b-2e04e1d8e110 快速开始 · 架构 · 4 模块工作流 · Skill 模式 · Examples · 评估 为什么需要 PatentRadar 传统侵权排查靠人工：律师团队读专利权 → 拆特征 → 翻竞品手册 → 搜证据 → 写 claim chart，一份高质量报告动辄 2-5 天。 PatentRadar 把这条链路压到 1 小时：4 个模块串行流水线 + 多源搜索 + 多模态证据抓取 +...
Looking for a PatentRadar alternative? If you're comparing PatentRadar with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🏛️ The patent plugin for AI coding agents — turn technical ideas into patent disclosures with Claude Code, Co
is a local reverse proxy providing unified access to multiple AI providers (Claude, Codex) through a single in
USPTO patent creation system with MCP server + Claude Code plugin. Hybrid RAG search over MPEP/USC/CFR, BigQ
DeepContext is an MCP server that adds symbol-aware semantic search to Claude Code, Codex CLI, and other agent
Your own Claude Code UI, sandbox, in-browser VS Code, terminal, multi-provider support (Anthropic, OpenAI, Git
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: