pfc-mcp — security grade SAFE, quality 73/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 73/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by yusong652 · MCP Server · ★ 103

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is pfc-mcp safe to install? View the security audit →

About pfc-mcp

pfc-mcp English | 简体中文 pfc-mcp connects AI agents to ITASCA PFC — Itasca's discrete element method (DEM) code — through the Model Context Protocol. Browse documentation, run simulations, and execute code, all through natural conversation. Tools (10) 5 documentation tools — browse and search PFC commands, Python API, and reference docs. No bridge required. 5 execution tools — interactive REPL, task submission, progress monitoring, interruption, and history. Requires bridge. First-time Setup Prerequisi

ai-agentclaudeclaude-codecodexdemdiscrete-element-methodgemini-cligeomechanicsitascaitasca-pfc

Quick Facts

Stars103
Forks11
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score72.8067223386706/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-06-25
Created2026-02-11
Platformsclaude-code, cli, codex, gemini, mcp, python
Est. Tokens~14k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with pfc-mcp for enhanced workflows:

  • DSkills — semantic(0.19)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (57%)
  • sub-agents-skills — semantic(0.16)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (56%)

pfc-mcp alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a pfc-mcp alternative? If you're comparing pfc-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • claude-prompts by minipuft · ⭐ 182

    MCP server for reusable prompt templates, multi-step workflow chains, and quality gates — compose agentic work

  • deterministic-agent-control-protocol by elliot35 · ⭐ 89

    Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT

  • XActions by nirholas · ⭐ 513

    ⚡ The Complete X/Twitter Automation Toolkit — Scrapers, MCP server for AI agents (Claude/GPT), CLI, browser sc

  • hevy-mcp by chrisdoc · ⭐ 455

    Manage your Hevy workouts, routines, folders, and exercise templates. Create and update sessions faster, organ

  • google-analytics-mcp by surendranb · ⭐ 235

    Google Analytics 4 data to AI agents, agentic workflows, and MCP clients. Give agents analysis-ready access to

  • claude-historian-mcp by Vvkmnn · ⭐ 177

    📜 An MCP server for conversation history search and retrieval in Claude Code

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is pfc-mcp?

pfc-mcp is MCP server connecting AI agents to ITASCA PFC — run DEM simulations through natural conversation. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 103 GitHub stars.

What programming language is pfc-mcp written in?

pfc-mcp is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as ai-agent, claude, claude-code.

How do I install or use pfc-mcp?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the pfc-mcp GitHub repository at github.com/yusong652/pfc-mcp. The project has 103 stars and 11 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does pfc-mcp use?

pfc-mcp is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to pfc-mcp?

The top alternatives to pfc-mcp on Agent Skills Hub include claude-prompts, deterministic-agent-control-protocol, XActions. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools