by zeljkoavramovic · MCP Server · ★ 126
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 126 |
| Forks | 18 |
| Language | HTML |
| Category | MCP Server |
| Quality Score | 64/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-05-26 |
| Created | 2025-10-21 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~30k |
Agentic Design Patterns This repository contains an interactive, single-file tutorial on essential agentic design patterns for building intelligent AI systems. Overview The included file is a self-contained interactive tutorial and reference guide to various patterns used in modern AI development.
These tools work well together with agentic-design-patterns for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a agentic-design-patterns alternative? If you're comparing agentic-design-patterns with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Autonomous Engineering
AI agent tooling for data engineering workflows.
A memory layer for AI Agents
🚀 Universal SDK for building next-gen MCP servers
The missing linter and lsp for AI coding assistants. Validate CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, SKILL.md, hooks, MCP. Plug
Manage MCP servers, skills and plugins across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and more. Built-in marketplace, one-c
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: