by zhulinchng · LLM Plugin · ★ 19
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 19 |
| Forks | 5 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | LLM Plugin |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 64/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-07 |
| Created | 2026-09-23 |
| Platforms | cli, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
Jev-shaped (TypeSafe System One) classification wrapper over OpenAI-like clients
These tools work well together with jevper for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a jevper alternative? If you're comparing jevper with other llm plugin tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Open-source alternative to TypeSafe's Jev: a System One style model layer that gives typed, calibrated decisio
Subagent Delegation framework for Pydantic AI, enabling nested subagents that can spawn their own specialists
🦾 A production‑ready research outreach AI agent that plans, discovers, reasons, uses tools, auto‑builds cited
Python library that allows you to get structured responses in the form of Pydantic models and Python types fro
Task Planning and Tracking toolset for Pydantic AI agents, enabling hierarchical task management with subtasks
A vast array of examples for the enterprise-grade and production-ready swarms framework.
Explore other popular llm plugin tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: