by 0xBakeer · Agent Tool · ★ 74
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 74 |
| Forks | 13 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | AGPL-3.0 |
| Quality Score | 58/100 |
| Open Issues | 19 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-04 |
| Created | 2026-09-28 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~22k |
TandemLLM <img src="https://img.shields.io/github/stars/0xBakeer/TandemLLM?style=social" alt="sta
Looking for a TandemLLM alternative? If you're comparing TandemLLM with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
LLM server for NVIDIA Blackwell only (GeForce RTX 50, RTX PRO). On one RTX 5090, Qwen3.8-27B one user: 96.3 to
An offline coding agent for local models. One command sets up the best model your GPU can run, and on 24 GB+ R
Self-hosted AI studio on your own GPU: chat with your files (RAG), screen and browser agents, coding swarms, L
Frontier-class open models on a free Kaggle TPU v5e-8: GLM-5.3-Flash 320B MoE (~64 tok/s, our own JAX engine)
🤖 Visual AI agent workflow automation platform with local LLM integration - build intelligent workflows using
A manager for AI coding agents that works with Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini, Codex, and Qwen.
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: