by 51bitquant · Agent Tool · ★ 624
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/51bitquant/ai-hedge-fund-crypto.gitTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
Flagged: install step in a code block runs a script from an untrusted host. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 624 |
| Forks | 155 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 74/100 |
| Open Issues | 12 |
| Last Updated | 2025-09-05 |
| Created | 2025-03-23 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~70k |
AI Hedge Fund Crypto A next-generation algorithmic trading framework that leverages graph-based workflow architecture, ensemble technical analysis, and AI language models to make data-driven cryptocurrency trading decisions.
Looking for a ai-hedge-fund-crypto alternative? If you're comparing ai-hedge-fund-crypto with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
结合多大模型分析与确定性代码风控的自主量化交易系统 ｜ Autonomous crypto trading system with multi-LLM analysis, deterministic Python ris
Multi-agent LLM investment committee that actually trades: AI seats debate, a CIO adopts one, 17 fail-closed r
algorithmic trading curated list quant finance trading bots backtesting technical analysis crypto open-source
Stock market MCP server for Yahoo Finance data, technical analysis, portfolio tracking, and Python backtesting
Shell and coding agent on mcp clients
LLMs and Machine Learning done easily
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: