MCP-Dandan — security grade SAFE, quality 71/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 71/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by 82ch · MCP Server · ★ 65

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is MCP-Dandan safe to install? View the security audit →

About MCP-Dandan

MCP-Dandan - MCP Security Framework MCP-Dandan Overview MCP-Dandan is an integrated monitoring service that observes MCP (Model Context Protocol) communications and detects security threats in real time. It features a modern desktop UI built with Electron for easy monitoring and management. Currently, MCP-Dandan is listed in well-known MCP-related open-source collections and can be found in the following repositories: Awesome MCP Servers – Security Awesome MCP Security – Tools & Code https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/928686ab-a5aa-4486-8d8e-d4a9592adc3e Features Real-time MCP Traffic Monitoring: Intercepts and analyzes MCP communications Multi-Engine Threat Detection: Command Injection Detection File System Exposure Detection PII Leak Detection(custom rules supported) Data Exfiltration De

ai-securityai-security-toolai-toolsawesome-listsmcpmcp-gatewaymcp-guardmcp-hostmcp-securitymcp-server

Quick Facts

Stars65
Forks8
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score70.6315171504923/100
Last Updated2026-08-10
Created2025-11-10
Platformsmcp, python
Est. Tokens~14k

MCP-Dandan alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a MCP-Dandan alternative? If you're comparing MCP-Dandan with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • hasmcp-ce by hasmcp · ⭐ 62

    HasMCP Community Edition

  • MCP-Defender by MCP-Defender · ⭐ 255

    Desktop app that automatically scans and blocks malicious MCP traffic in AI apps like Cursor, Claude, VS Code

  • toolhive-studio by stacklok · ⭐ 165

    ToolHive is an application that allows you to install, manage and run MCP servers and connect them to AI agent

  • compliant-llm by fiddlecube · ⭐ 161

    Build Secure and Compliant AI agents and MCP Servers. YC W23

  • forgemax by postrv · ⭐ 151

    Code Mode inspired local sandboxed MCP Gateway - collapses N servers x M tools into 2 tools (~1,000 tokens)

  • deterministic-agent-control-protocol by elliot35 · ⭐ 89

    Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is MCP-Dandan?

MCP-Dandan is MCP Security Solution for Agentic AI — real-time proxying, behavior analysis, and malicious tool detection. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 65 GitHub stars.

What programming language is MCP-Dandan written in?

MCP-Dandan is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as ai-security, ai-security-tool, ai-tools.

How do I install or use MCP-Dandan?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the MCP-Dandan GitHub repository at github.com/82ch/MCP-Dandan. The project has 65 stars and 8 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does MCP-Dandan use?

MCP-Dandan is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to MCP-Dandan?

The top alternatives to MCP-Dandan on Agent Skills Hub include hasmcp-ce, MCP-Defender, toolhive-studio. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools