by 82ch · MCP Server · ★ 67
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/82ch/MCP-Dandan.gitTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 67 |
| Forks | 8 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 71/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-22 |
| Created | 2025-11-10 |
| Platforms | mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
MCP-Dandan - MCP Security Framework MCP-Dandan Overview MCP-Dandan is an integrated monitoring service that observes MCP (Model Context Protocol) communications and detects security threats in real time. It features a modern desktop UI built with Electron for easy monitoring and management.
Looking for a MCP-Dandan alternative? If you're comparing MCP-Dandan with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
HasMCP Community Edition
Desktop app that automatically scans and blocks malicious MCP traffic in AI apps like Cursor, Claude, VS Code
ToolHive is an application that allows you to install, manage and run MCP servers and connect them to AI agent
Build Secure and Compliant AI agents and MCP Servers. YC W23
Code Mode inspired local sandboxed MCP Gateway - collapses N servers x M tools into 2 tools (~1,000 tokens)
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: