by fiddlecube · MCP Server · ★ 162
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
pip install compliant-llmTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 162 |
| Forks | 14 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 69/100 |
| Open Issues | 4 |
| Last Updated | 2025-06-06 |
| Created | 2023-07-04 |
| Platforms | mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~3995k |
Compliant LLM is your comprehensive toolkit for ensuring compliance and security of your AI
Looking for a compliant-llm alternative? If you're comparing compliant-llm with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Security toolkit for AI agents. Scan your machine for dangerous skills and MCP configs, monitor for supply cha
Security scanner MCP server for AI coding agents. Prompt injection firewall, package hallucination detection (
MCP Security Solution for Agentic AI — real-time proxying, behavior analysis, and malicious tool detection
lunar.dev: Agent native MCP Gateway for governance and security
Python and TypeScript SDKs for verifiable evidence of AI agent actions. Signed receipts, policy enforcement, a
A plugin-based gateway that orchestrates other MCPs and allows developers to build upon it enterprise-grade ag
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: