by TheLunarCompany · MCP Server · ★ 508
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 508 |
| Forks | 56 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 54/100 |
| Open Issues | 23 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-06 |
| Created | 2023-08-15 |
| Platforms | mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
Welcome to Lunar.dev Lunar.dev is an open-source platform for managing, governing and optimizing third-party API consumption across applications and AI agent workloads at scale. Consumption Management for the AI Era As AI agents and autonomous workflows increasingly rely on external APIs, there's a growing need for a mediation layer that acts as a central aggregation point between applications,...
Looking for a lunar alternative? If you're comparing lunar with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
MCP Router — development, support and security updates ended 2026-09-18. Historical source and final release f
An MCP client for Neovim that seamlessly integrates MCP servers into your editing workflow with an intuitive i
MCP Server Framework and Tool Development library for building custom capabilities into agents.
🔥🔒 Awesome MCP (Model Context Protocol) Security 🖥️
A unified Model Context Protocol server implementation that aggregates multiple MCP servers into one.
MCP Playbooks for AI agents
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: