ablation — security grade SAFE, quality 63/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 63/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by Ablation-Tool · Codex Skill · ★ 66

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is ablation safe to install? View the security audit →

About ablation

Ablation is a reverse engineering framework that provides the exact same core disassembly, decompilation, and binary analysis capabilities as industry-standard tools like Ghidra, IDA Pro, and Binary Ninja. Combined with with Claude Code or OpenAI Codex, it transforms into a fully autonomous reverse engineering tool. Capabilities Semantic Search via BERT: Semantic search finds results based on meaning rather than exact keywords. BERT reads text and figures out what it means. Similar meanings get similar scores, so you can search by concept instead of exact words. By combining the two, it speeds up the main bottleneck of reverse engineering while finding the vulnerable functions. Extreme Performance: A 50 MB binary loads in 35 seconds. Ghidra and IDA Pro can take hours because they parse the entire file into a database before you can do anything. Ablation only analyzes the functions you are actively working on, so you start immediately.

binary-analysisbytecode-decompilerclaude-codecodexdecompilerdisassemblerfirmware-analysisreverse-engineering

Quick Facts

Stars66
Forks6
LanguagePython
CategoryCodex Skill
Quality Score62.6142914401651/100
Last Updated2026-10-03
Created2026-09-23
Platformsclaude-code, codex, python
Est. Tokens~17k

ablation alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a ablation alternative? If you're comparing ablation with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • ghidra-cli by akiselev · ⭐ 210

    Automate Ghidra reverse engineering from the command line — headless analysis, decompilation, and structured J

  • ida-headless-mcp by zboralski · ⭐ 160

    Headless IDA Pro binary analysis via Model Context Protocol

  • ceasta by ngwg · ⭐ 110

    disassembler, decompiler and debugger in one, with a built-in mcp server: point an ai at a binary and it can d

  • algokiller-plugin by icloudza · ⭐ 77

    ARM64 trace evidence analysis & cipher algorithm recovery — Claude Desktop plugin with skills + local MCP serv

  • areclaw by TheQmaks · ⭐ 61

    Android Reverse Engineering Command-Line Automation Workspace. AI-driven security analysis with Claude Code.

  • rev-skills by dslsdzc · ⭐ 59

    122 个逆向工程 AI 技能(可发布、跨平台):恶意软件分析 / 软件逆向 / 固件嵌入式 / 协议逆向 / 移动应用 / 脱壳反混淆 / 软件破解 / 漏洞挖掘 / 托管代码 / 取证情报 / CTF。

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is ablation?

ablation is Ablation is a reverse engineering framework. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 66 GitHub stars.

What programming language is ablation written in?

ablation is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as binary-analysis, bytecode-decompiler, claude-code.

How do I install or use ablation?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the ablation GitHub repository at github.com/Ablation-Tool/ablation. The project has 66 stars and 6 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to ablation?

The top alternatives to ablation on Agent Skills Hub include ghidra-cli, ida-headless-mcp, ceasta. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools