ceasta — security grade SAFE, quality 61/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 61/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by ngwg · MCP Server · ★ 110

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is ceasta safe to install? View the security audit →

About ceasta

ceasta a disassembler, decompiler and debugger in one — for windows and linux ida-style listing, a decompiler, a function graph, an x64dbg-style debugger, lua plugins, and a built-in MCP server so you can point an AI at a binary — one small program, everything vendored, nothing to install to build. one function, three ways ceasta shows the same code from raw bytes up to readable c, so you can drop to whatever level you need: text ; assembly - the real instructions // pseudocode (f5) - reconstructed c checksum proc int checksum(int rdi) movzx edx, byte ptr [rdi] { test dl, dl rdx = (char)rdi; je loc1191 if (rdx == 0) { mov eax, 0x1505 return 0x1505; loc1179: } mov ecx, eax

capstonecapstone-projectcppdebuggerdecompilerdisassemblerelfimguiluamacos

Quick Facts

Stars110
Forks3
LanguageC++
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseGPL-3.0
Quality Score61.2784422954558/100
Last Updated2026-09-26
Created2025-10-07
Platformsmcp
Est. Tokens~19k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with ceasta for enhanced workflows:

  • x64dbg_mcp — semantic(0.37)+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (57%)
  • sm64ds-decomp — semantic(0.16)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (56%)
  • ghidra-cli — semantic(0.27)+complementary+rare_topics+similar_pop+shared_platform (54%)

ceasta alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a ceasta alternative? If you're comparing ceasta with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • OpenImageDebugger by OpenImageDebugger · ⭐ 250

    An advanced in-memory image visualization plugin for GDB and LLDB on Linux, with experimental support for MacO

  • rea by morluto · ⭐ 451

    Reverse engineer anything with agents, from app behavior down to native binaries.

  • x64dbg_mcp by bromoket · ⭐ 96

    Drive x64dbg with your AI. MCP server: 23 mega-tools / 153 endpoints for breakpoints, memory, disasm, tracing,

  • ablation by Ablation-Tool · ⭐ 66

    Ablation is a reverse engineering framework

  • cheatengine-mcp-tcp-bridge by HollyZoe · ⭐ 54

    TCP-enhanced fork of Cheat Engine MCP Bridge. Connect Cursor, Copilot and Claude AI directly to local or remot

  • dotfiles by joshukraine · ⭐ 429

    :round_pushpin: My dotfiles for macOS using Neovim, Zsh, and Ghostty + Tmux

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular C++ Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is ceasta?

ceasta is disassembler, decompiler and debugger in one, with a built-in mcp server: point an ai at a binary and it can debug it, not just read it. ida-style listing, pseudocode (f5), x64dbg-style debugger (wind. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 110 GitHub stars.

What programming language is ceasta written in?

ceasta is primarily written in C++. It covers topics such as capstone, capstone-project, cpp.

How do I install or use ceasta?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the ceasta GitHub repository at github.com/ngwg/ceasta. The project has 110 stars and 3 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does ceasta use?

ceasta is released under the GPL-3.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to ceasta?

The top alternatives to ceasta on Agent Skills Hub include OpenImageDebugger, rea, x64dbg_mcp. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools