MPLSandbox — security grade SAFE, quality 70/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 70/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by Ablustrund · Agent Tool · ★ 178

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is MPLSandbox safe to install? View the security audit →

About MPLSandbox

✨ MPLSandbox MPLSandbox is an out-of-the-box multi-programming language sandbox designed to provide unified and comprehensive feedback from compiler and analysis tools for LLMs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.23074 🔍 Introduction we propose MPLSandbox, an out-of-the-box sandbox designed to provide unified compiler feedback across multiple programming languages. Additionally, it integrates traditional code analysis tools, delivering comprehensive code information to LLMs from numerous perspectives. MPLSandbox simplifies code analysis for researchers, and can be seamlessly integrated into LLM training and application processes to enhance the performance of LLMs in a range of code-related tasks. MPLSandbox consists of three core modules: Multi-Programming Language Sandbox Environment This Module can provide unified compiler feedback by compiling and executing the code. The code and unit test samples are sent to the sub-sandbox of the corresponding programming language for isolated execution to obtain compiler feedback.

analysis-frameworkllmllm4codesandboxtool

Quick Facts

Stars178
Forks29
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseApache-2.0
Quality Score69.594319382287/100
Open Issues2
Last Updated2025-04-15
Created2024-10-29
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~1710k

MPLSandbox alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a MPLSandbox alternative? If you're comparing MPLSandbox with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • sandstorm by tomascupr · ⭐ 448

    Run Claude agents in secure cloud sandboxes — via API, CLI, or Slack. One call. Full agent. Zero infrastructur

  • gptree by travisvn · ⭐ 290

    A CLI tool to provide LLM context for coding projects by combining project files into a single text file (or c

  • claudex by Mng-dev-ai · ⭐ 224

    Your own Claude Code UI, sandbox, in-browser VS Code, terminal, multi-provider support (Anthropic, OpenAI, Git

  • SecGPT by llm-platform-security · ⭐ 121

    An Execution Isolation Architecture for LLM-Based Agentic Systems

  • cuga-agent by cuga-project · ⭐ 889

    CUGA is an open-source generalist agent harness for the enterprise, supporting complex task execution on web a

  • hyper-mcp by hyper-mcp-rs · ⭐ 883

    📦️ A fast, secure MCP server that extends its capabilities through WebAssembly plugins.

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is MPLSandbox?

MPLSandbox is MPLSandbox is an out-of-the-box multi-programming language sandbox designed to provide unified and comprehensive feedback from compiler and analysis tools for LLMs.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 178 GitHub stars.

What programming language is MPLSandbox written in?

MPLSandbox is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as analysis-framework, llm, llm4code.

How do I install or use MPLSandbox?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the MPLSandbox GitHub repository at github.com/Ablustrund/MPLSandbox. The project has 178 stars and 29 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does MPLSandbox use?

MPLSandbox is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to MPLSandbox?

The top alternatives to MPLSandbox on Agent Skills Hub include sandstorm, gptree, claudex. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools