by Amio242 · MCP Server · ★ 58
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 58 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | HTML |
| Category | MCP Server |
| Quality Score | 71/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-05 |
| Created | 2026-10-22 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, gemini, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~20k |
mcp-memory-server This package is the MCP server for a hosted memory layer that lets AI agents keep what they learn across sessions and tools: write a memory once, and any connected client can recall it later by natural-language query.
Looking for a mcp-memory-server alternative? If you're comparing mcp-memory-server with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Notion MCP server with token auth: connect Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code and Codex to Notion pa
Persistent long-term memory for Claude Code via MCP — captures coding decisions, bugfixes, and context across
Persistent memory for AI coding agents
Claude Code / Codex 共用的长期记忆 MCP：本地 Markdown/Obsidian 存储，跨工具记住你的项目与偏好｜Local-first shared memory MCP for Claude
Outcome-based persistent memory MCP server for Claude Code and OpenCode. Good advice promoted, bad advice demo
📜 An MCP server for conversation history search and retrieval in Claude Code
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: