by AnEntrypoint · MCP Server · ★ 122
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 122 |
| Forks | 13 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 64/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-03-02 |
| Created | 2025-03-30 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~1554k |
gm-exec NOTE: If you're looking fore mcp-repl or, glootie, or GM... its now at: http://github.com/anEntrypoint/gm Code execution tool for MCP clients and CLI. Multi-language support (JS/TS, Python, Go, Rust, C, C++, Deno, Java, bash). Built on Bun with PM2-managed process isolation.
These tools work well together with mcp-gm for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a mcp-gm alternative? If you're comparing mcp-gm with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Graph-native code intelligence that replaces embedding-based RAG with deterministic program understanding.
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides advanced code analysis and reasoning capabilities powered
The code quality toolkit for the agentic AI era. Find dead code, clones, and scaffolding across 15 languages.
MCP Server for Tree-sitter
📜 An MCP server for conversation history search and retrieval in Claude Code
AI-powered code quality analysis using MCP to help AI assistants review code more effectively. Analyze git cha
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: