by Arize-ai · LLM Plugin · ★ 12.2k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
pip install arize-phoenixTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 12,191 |
| Forks | 1,273 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | LLM Plugin |
| Quality Score | 51/100 |
| Open Issues | 1202 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-07 |
| Created | 2022-11-09 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~22k |
<img...
These tools work well together with phoenix for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a phoenix alternative? If you're comparing phoenix with other llm plugin tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Laminar - open-source observability platform purpose-built for AI agents. YC S24.
Test your prompts, agents, and RAGs. Red teaming/pentesting/vulnerability scanning for AI. Compare performance
A blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Route to 1,600+ LLMs, 50+ AI Guardrails with 1 fast & fr
Python SDK for AI agent monitoring, LLM cost tracking, benchmarking, and more. Integrates with most LLMs and a
Build, Evaluate, and Optimize AI Systems. Includes evals, RAG, agents, fine-tuning, synthetic data generation,
AI observability platform for production LLM and agent systems.
Explore other popular llm plugin tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: