by Arun-kc · MCP Server · ★ 8
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 8 |
| Forks | 2 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 50/100 |
| Open Issues | 6 |
| Last Updated | 2026-06-21 |
| Created | 2026-05-10 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~13k |
The trust and intelligence layer between AI agents and your database. Read-only by architecture, semantic knowledge graph + audit log, MCP-native.
Looking for a schemabrain alternative? If you're comparing schemabrain with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
MCP server for YouTube — search videos, get transcripts, channels, and playlists. Works with Claude, Cursor &
Automated loop driver, slash commands, council automation, MCP browser bridge, and portfolio governance for Cl
Open-source Semantic Sidecar for AI, analytics, and governed data systems. Compiles declarative YAML models in
Get Claude Code and other AI agents approved for use at work — deterministic guardrails on every tool call, ta
MCP Security Solution for Agentic AI — real-time proxying, behavior analysis, and malicious tool detection
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: