by AxiomCodeAI · MCP Server · ★ 482
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/AxiomCodeAI/axiomcodegraph.gitTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 482 |
| Forks | 91 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| Quality Score | 66/100 |
| Open Issues | 78 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-05 |
| Created | 2026-08-22 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex, gemini, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~20k |
AxiomCode Graph A god's-eye view of your codebase for AI agents. Stop grepping. Ensure correctness and completeness for any task your AI agent performs. <
Looking for a axiomcodegraph alternative? If you're comparing axiomcodegraph with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Structural code intelligence for AI agents — semantic search, knowledge graphs, and a built-in MCP server in o
Reusable project context and specialist workflows for the AI tools you already use. Agents, skills, rules and
Native, local-first knowledge graph engine for code and project artifacts—inspired by Graphify, built in Rust,
Define task-specific AI sub-agents in Markdown for any MCP-compatible tool.
Open-source cross-agent memory layer for coding agents via MCP. Compatible with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Wi
100% Rust implementation of code graphRAG with blazing fast AST+FastML parsing, surrealDB backend and advanced
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: