sub-agents-mcp — security grade SAFE, quality 78/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 78/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by shinpr · MCP Server · ★ 98

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is sub-agents-mcp safe to install? View the security audit →

About sub-agents-mcp

Sub-Agents MCP Server Bring Claude Code–style sub-agents to any MCP-compatible tool. This MCP server lets you define task-specific AI agents (like "test-writer" or "code-reviewer") in markdown files, and execute them via Cursor CLI, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, or Codex backends. Why? Claude Code offers powerful sub-agent workflows—but they're limited to its own environment. This MCP server makes that workflow portable, so any MCP-compatible tool (Cursor, Claude Desktop, Windsurf, etc.) can use the same agents. Concrete benefits: Define reusable agents once, use them across multiple tools Share agent definitions within teams regardless of IDE choice Leverage Cursor CLI, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, or Codex capabilities from any MCP client → Read the full story Alternative: Agent Skills sub-agents-skills offers a lightweight alternative. Choose sub-agents-mcp

ai-agentsantigravityclaude-codecodexcursordeveloper-toolsglmgrokkimimcp

Quick Facts

Stars98
Forks15
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score77.9490441557864/100
Last Updated2026-09-10
Created2025-08-15
Platformsclaude-code, codex, mcp, node
Est. Tokens~17k

sub-agents-mcp alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a sub-agents-mcp alternative? If you're comparing sub-agents-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • hcom by aannoo · ⭐ 490

    Let AI agents message, watch, and spawn each other across terminals. Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI, Curs

  • the-pair by timwuhaotian · ⭐ 363

    Open-source AI pair programming for desktop: a Mentor + Executor agent cross-check each other's code to catch

  • tmux-bridge-mcp by howardpen9 · ⭐ 94

    Standalone MCP server for cross-pane AI agent communication via tmux. Lets Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Codex, and

  • agent-skills by Nimbleway · ⭐ 52

    Agent skills that give AI agents live web data — search, scrape, and extract structured data with Extraction T

  • Context-Engine by Context-Engine-AI · ⭐ 402

    Context-Engine MCP - Agentic Context Compression Suite

  • aiwg by jmagly · ⭐ 211

    Cognitive architecture for AI-augmented software development. Specialized agents, structured workflows, and mu

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is sub-agents-mcp?

sub-agents-mcp is Define task-specific AI sub-agents in Markdown for any MCP-compatible tool.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 98 GitHub stars.

What programming language is sub-agents-mcp written in?

sub-agents-mcp is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as ai-agents, antigravity, claude-code.

How do I install or use sub-agents-mcp?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the sub-agents-mcp GitHub repository at github.com/shinpr/sub-agents-mcp. The project has 98 stars and 15 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does sub-agents-mcp use?

sub-agents-mcp is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to sub-agents-mcp?

The top alternatives to sub-agents-mcp on Agent Skills Hub include hcom, the-pair, tmux-bridge-mcp. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools