tmux-bridge-mcp — security grade SAFE, quality 65/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 65/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by howardpen9 · MCP Server · ★ 94

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is tmux-bridge-mcp safe to install? View the security audit →

About tmux-bridge-mcp

tmux-bridge-mcp English | 简体中文 A standalone MCP server that lets AI agents (Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Codex, Kimi CLI) communicate with each other through tmux panes. It talks directly to tmux -- no external dependencies beyond tmux itself. 🖥️ What is tmux? tmux is a terminal multiplexer -- it lets you split one terminal window into multiple panes, each running its own process independently. Think of it as "tabs on steroids" for your terminal. Each pane is a full terminal. You can have Claude Code running in one, Codex in another, Gemini in a third -- all visible at the same time, all on the same machine. The problem: these panes can't talk to each other. An agent in Pane 1 has no idea what's happening in Pane 2. tmux-bridge fixes this. It gives every agent the ability to read, type, and send messages into any other pane. ⚡ What can you do with tmux-bridge? Once

ai-agentsclaude-codecodexcross-panedeveloper-toolsgemini-clikimimcpmcp-servermulti-agent

Quick Facts

Stars94
Forks12
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryMCP Server
Quality Score64.5042472392399/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-07-19
Created2026-03-28
Platformsclaude-code, cli, codex, gemini, mcp, node
Est. Tokens~18k

tmux-bridge-mcp alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a tmux-bridge-mcp alternative? If you're comparing tmux-bridge-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • sub-agents-mcp by shinpr · ⭐ 98

    Define task-specific AI sub-agents in Markdown for any MCP-compatible tool.

  • agent-skills by jdrhyne · ⭐ 241

    A collection of AI agent skills for Clawdbot, Claude Code, Codex

  • sub-agents-skills by shinpr · ⭐ 83

    Cross-LLM sub-agent orchestration as an Agent Skills. Route tasks to Codex, Claude Code, Grok, GLM, Kimi, Curs

  • daymon by daymonio · ⭐ 365

    Daymon puts your favorite AI to work 24/7. It schedules, remembers, and orchestrates your own virtual team. Fr

  • deepcontext-mcp by Wildcard-Official · ⭐ 278

    DeepContext is an MCP server that adds symbol-aware semantic search to Claude Code, Codex CLI, and other agent

  • claude-ipc-mcp by jdez427 · ⭐ 132

    AI-to-AI communication protocol for Claude, Gemini, and other AI assistants

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is tmux-bridge-mcp?

tmux-bridge-mcp is Standalone MCP server for cross-pane AI agent communication via tmux. Lets Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Codex, and Kimi CLI talk to each other through tmux panes.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 94 GitHub stars.

What programming language is tmux-bridge-mcp written in?

tmux-bridge-mcp is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as ai-agents, claude-code, codex.

How do I install or use tmux-bridge-mcp?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the tmux-bridge-mcp GitHub repository at github.com/howardpen9/tmux-bridge-mcp. The project has 94 stars and 12 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to tmux-bridge-mcp?

The top alternatives to tmux-bridge-mcp on Agent Skills Hub include sub-agents-mcp, agent-skills, sub-agents-skills. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools