by Brattlof · MCP Server · ★ 8
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 8 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | Go |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 73/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-21 |
| Created | 2026-06-13 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, gemini, go, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
Package manager for MCP servers, Agent Skills (SKILL.md), and Claude Code commands, hooks, subagents, and output styles. Installs into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, Copilot, and Cline.
Looking for a skillet alternative? If you're comparing skillet with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Define task-specific AI sub-agents in Markdown for any MCP-compatible tool.
90 specialist AI agents + 3 project-local extensions for Claude Code / Codex CLI / Antigravity CLI (agy). Anth
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
The hivemind for AI coding agents — persistent team context recorded once and recalled across agents, machines
Cross-LLM sub-agent orchestration as an Agent Skills. Route tasks to Codex, Claude Code, Grok, GLM, Kimi, Curs
Package manager for Claude Code skills and agents and other AI related resources
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: