Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/ChiSonKon/telegram-business-ai-bot.gitTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 75 |
| Forks | 11 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 60/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-07-23 |
| Created | 2026-05-19 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
Telegram Business AI Bot 🤖 简体中文 | English 只需通过 Telegram 官方 Business 接口将机器人绑定为个人账号的「聊天自动化 / 秘书机器人 (Secretary Bot)」，即可全自动托管您的私信会话。AI 智能决策回复、RAG 向量数据库语义检索、防刷人机验证码，并支持多模型自动容灾负载均衡。 💡 核心特性 秘书模式 (Secretary Mode) 聊天自动化：基于 Telegram Business 最新推出的 [Secretary Bots
Looking for a telegram-business-ai-bot alternative? If you're comparing telegram-business-ai-bot with other ai tool tools, these 3 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Skip to content github / docs Code Issues 80 Pull requests 35 Discussions Actions Projects 2 Security Insights
Skill to talk to Claude about your projects over the phone
.NET MAUI skills for GitHub Copilot and Claude Code
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: