by Cloudflare-Studio · AI Tool · ★ 263
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 263 |
| Forks | 23 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 71/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-28 |
| Created | 2025-12-26 |
| Platforms | node |
| Est. Tokens | ~23k |
ask-bonk Just it. It's a code (and docs!) review agent that responds to mentions in issues and PRs. Built on OpenCode and Flue, Bonk can review code, answer questions about your codebase, and make changes directly by opening PRs and telling you where you can do better.
Looking for a ask-bonk alternative? If you're comparing ask-bonk with other ai tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
AI writes code. This automates everything else · 24 plugins · 49 agents · 44 skills · for Claude Code, OpenCod
One memory layer, every AI tool. Store anything once — recall it in Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, or any MCP client
use claude code's agent teams orchestraction with any harness
A single interface to use and evaluate different agent frameworks
Review AI coding agents' plans, diffs and running apps in the browser. Local-first, works with any agent.
A personal context store for AI agents and assistants—reuse your existing coding agent CLI (Codex/Claude/OpenC
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: