by CoderMageFox · Codex Skill · ★ 50
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/CoderMageFox/claudecode-codex-subagents.git
/plugin marketplace add CoderMageFox/claudecode-codex-subagentsTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 50 |
| Forks | 4 |
| Language | Shell |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 63/100 |
| Open Issues | 3 |
| Last Updated | 2025-11-07 |
| Created | 2025-11-06 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex |
| Est. Tokens | ~11k |
Codex Subagents - Claude Code Plugin 中文 | English 通过并行委托多个 Codex 代理来编排复杂任务，然后合并和审查结果的 Claude Code 插件。 功能特点 🚀 并行处理: 将复杂任务分解为可并行执行的单元（每批最多3个代理） 🔗 链式处理: 超过3个任务时自动进行链式批量处理 📊 实时进度: 使用 TodoWrite 实时显示任务执行进度 📝 详细日志: 所有子代理活动记录到 目录 🤖 智能委托: 通过 MCP 服务器自动委托给多个 Codex 子代理 🔄 智能合并: 自动检测冲突并应用最佳合并策略 ✅ 质量验证: 包含编译、测试、代码质量等多重验证关卡 快速安装 方式 1：一键安装脚本（推荐） 适合：首次使用，希望全自动安装 安装脚本会自动完成： ✅ 检测并自动安装缺失的依赖（Python 3, uv, Codex...
Looking for a claudecode-codex-subagents alternative? If you're comparing claudecode-codex-subagents with other codex skill tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A Codex/Claude skill that maintains per-repo operating theory documents.
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: