by Coooolfan · MCP Server · ★ 52
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 52 |
| Forks | 15 |
| Language | Go |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | AGPL-3.0 |
| Quality Score | 74/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-14 |
| Created | 2026-02-07 |
| Platforms | go, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
Onlyboxes 简体中文 Onlyboxes is a self-hosted code execution sandbox platform for individuals and small teams. It uses a control-plane () and execution-plane () architecture, and exposes both REST APIs and MCP tools.
Looking for a onlyboxes alternative? If you're comparing onlyboxes with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
File Storage & Sandbox Backends for Pydantic AI: console tools for file operations, Docker-isolated sandboxes
Your own Claude Code UI, sandbox, in-browser VS Code, terminal, multi-provider support (Anthropic, OpenAI, Git
MPLSandbox is an out-of-the-box multi-programming language sandbox designed to provide unified and comprehensi
A lightweight secure Self-evolution engine built in Rust, featuring a built-in native system-level sandbox, ze
An Execution Isolation Architecture for LLM-Based Agentic Systems
the universal sandbox runtime for agents and humans.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: