by Cre4T3Tiv3 · Agent Tool · ★ 61
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/Cre4T3Tiv3/ai-agents-reality-checkTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 61 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 65/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2026-04-02 |
| Created | 2025-08-07 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~250k |
Benchmarking the gap between AI agent hype and architectural reality. Mathematically rigorous evaluation framework that classifies agent implementations into three archetypes and measures the performance chasm between them. The Thesis Most systems marketed as "AI agents" are prompt-chained wrappers around LLM APIs.
Looking for a ai-agents-reality-check alternative? If you're comparing ai-agents-reality-check with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Regression testing for AI agents. Snapshot behavior,diff tool calls,catch regressions in CI. Works with LangGr
Open-source sandboxes where coding agents build and deploy. Spin up isolated environments where Claude Code, C
Penpot MCP server
Manage / Proxy / Secure your MCP Servers
Command a fleet of AI agents, on every deck, every desk, every wrist. Self-hosted multi-agent platform with me
MCP Server for Facebook ADs Library - Get instant answers from FB's ad library
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: