by CrowdStrike · MCP Server · ★ 277
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
uv tool install falcon-mcp
pip install falcon-mcpTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 277 |
| Forks | 97 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 70/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-03 |
| Created | 2025-06-10 |
| Platforms | mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~21k |
falcon-mcp falcon-mcp is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that connects AI agents with the CrowdStrike Falcon platform, powering intelligent security analysis in your agentic workflows. It delivers programmatic access to essential security capabilities—including detections, incidents, and behaviors—establishing the foundation for advanced security operations and automation.
Looking for a falcon-mcp alternative? If you're comparing falcon-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 2 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Toolkit for fine-tuning, ablating and unit-testing open-source LLMs.
一个基于HuggingFace开发的大语言模型训练、测试工具。支持各模型的webui、终端预测，低参数量及全参数模型训练(预训练、SFT、RM、PPO、DPO)和融合、量化。
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: