jev-dsh-decision — security grade SAFE, quality 62/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 62/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by Devin-AXIS · Codex Skill · ★ 253

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is jev-dsh-decision safe to install? View the security audit →

About jev-dsh-decision

Jev DSH 决策引擎 为 Agent Harness 提供结构化决策能力。 将 TypeSafe AI 的 Jev 决策能力接入你的 Agent:帮助选择工具、Skill 和任务负责人,评估产出质量,并以结构化结果返回判断与概率。Jev 负责辅助决策,原 Agent 继续负责规划和执行。 提供 DeepSeek Harness 原生插件和 iPolloWork 导入插件两个安装入口;在 iPolloWork 中可供 OpenCode、DeepSeek Harness、Codex Harness 使用。同一份决策核心,不修改引擎源码,不接管主 Agent。 快速开始:安装到 DeepSeek Harness · 安装到 iPolloWork 支持与接入方式 OpenCode 和 Codex Harness 当前支持的是 iPolloWork 内的接入方式,本仓库尚未提供它们各自的独立原生安装包。其他 Harness 可以基于共享决策核心开发适配器,不代表已经自动兼容。 核心能力 根据任务,在当前真实可用且获准使用的工具、Skill、Agent 之间推荐选择。 按明确标准评分、判断是否需要某项能力;独立问题可以一次批量评估。 返回选择、概率、置信度与用量;不执行推荐动作,也不自动切换模型或路由所有请求。 提供本地配置检查和真实连接测试。连接测试会产生少量 TypeSafe API 用量。 Jev 是 TypeSafe AI 的结构化决策模型,不是聊天模

agent-harnessai-agentsapollo-plugincodexcodex-harness-plugincodex-plugindecision-enginedeepseek-harnessdeepseek-harness-plugindeepseek-plugin

Quick Facts

Stars253
Forks83
LanguageJavaScript
CategoryCodex Skill
Quality Score61.6889246637747/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-09-20
Created2026-09-20
Platformscodex, node
Est. Tokens~5k

jev-dsh-decision alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a jev-dsh-decision alternative? If you're comparing jev-dsh-decision with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • wesight by freestylefly · ⭐ 933

    Open-source desktop AI agent workspace with one-click Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, Hermes Agent setup and cus

  • graph-memory by adoresever · ⭐ 633

    Deepseek Harness、Openclaw知识图谱记忆插件。2026年4月受邀发布在清华大学讨论会。Knowledge Graph + Memory;Knowledge Graph Context Engine

  • modsearch by liustack · ⭐ 540

    🥇 The strongest free web search plugin for DeepSeek Harness, and the search bridge for every model without na

  • MisakaNet by Ikalus1988 · ⭐ 521

    📚 A zero-dependency, git-backed micro-lesson library for AI Agents to asynchronously share and search verifie

  • dsh-agent-team-gui by toolclub · ⭐ 219

    Persistent multi-model workflow teams for DeepSeek Harness — dynamic lead planning, bounded DAGs, per-agent mo

  • cetus by drewnekota · ⭐ 147

    One macOS app for Claude Code, Codex, and every agent runtime you use — scheduled runs, global hotkey launcher

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular JavaScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is jev-dsh-decision?

jev-dsh-decision is Jev DSH 决策引擎|面向 Agent Harness 的结构化决策插件。原生支持 DeepSeek Harness,通过 iPolloWork 支持 OpenCode、Codex Harness。. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 253 GitHub stars.

What programming language is jev-dsh-decision written in?

jev-dsh-decision is primarily written in JavaScript. It covers topics such as agent-harness, ai-agents, apollo-plugin.

How do I install or use jev-dsh-decision?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the jev-dsh-decision GitHub repository at github.com/Devin-AXIS/jev-dsh-decision. The project has 253 stars and 83 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to jev-dsh-decision?

The top alternatives to jev-dsh-decision on Agent Skills Hub include wesight, graph-memory, modsearch. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools