by ErikBjare · Agent Tool · ★ 599
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 599 |
| Forks | 32 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 63/100 |
| Open Issues | 5 |
| Last Updated | 2025-01-27 |
| Created | 2023-07-19 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~5k |
🛠️ Are Copilots Local Yet? Current trends and state of the art for using open & local LLM models as copilots to complete code, generate projects, act as shell assistants, automatically fix bugs, and more.
Looking for a are-copilots-local-yet alternative? If you're comparing are-copilots-local-yet with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Unlock GitHub Copilot as a local API Gateway. Use Copilot with Cursor, LangChain, and any OpenAI-compatible to
Conquer Any Code in VSCode: One-Click Comments, Conversions, UI-to-Code, and AI Batch Processing of Files! 在 V
🦙 Integrating LLMs into structured NLP pipelines
A set of tools that gives agents powerful capabilities.
Chat with any codebase in under two minutes | Fully local or via third-party APIs
Agent samples built using the Strands Agents SDK.
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: