ctxvault — security grade SAFE, quality 70/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 70/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by Filippo-Venturini · MCP Server · ★ 60

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is ctxvault safe to install? View the security audit →

About ctxvault

Local memory infrastructure for AI agents Isolated vaults. Typed memory. Agent-autonomous. Human-observable. Installation • Quick Start • Examples • Documentation • API Reference What is CtxVault? Most agent frameworks treat memory as an afterthought — a shared vector store where isolation depends on configuration staying correct and everything, facts and procedures alike, gets embedded into the same undifferentiated index. The agent cannot tell what it knows from how it should act. CtxVault is built

agentic-aiai-agentschromadbclaudecli-toolembeddingsfastapiknowledge-baselangchainllm

Quick Facts

Stars60
Forks10
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score69.8232453499527/100
Open Issues2
Last Updated2026-06-29
Created2025-12-12
Platformsclaude-code, cli, mcp, python
Est. Tokens~19k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with ctxvault for enhanced workflows:

  • honcho — semantic(0.32)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+shared_platform (55%)
  • llm-agent — semantic(0.16)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (55%)

ctxvault alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a ctxvault alternative? If you're comparing ctxvault with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • oreilly-ai-agents by sinanuozdemir · ⭐ 299

    An introduction to the world of AI Agents

  • omega-memory by omega-memory · ⭐ 219

    Persistent memory for AI coding agents

  • pdf-mcp by jztan · ⭐ 147

    MCP server that lets Claude Code and other AI agents read and search large PDFs, one file or a whole folder: a

  • gno by gmickel · ⭐ 115

    Local AI-powered document search and editing with first-in-class hybrid retrieval, LLM answers, WebUI, REST AP

  • mychatarchive by 1ch1n · ⭐ 65

    Local-first AI memory archive. Import ChatGPT, Claude, and Grok exports, generate semantic embeddings, and sea

  • roampal-core by roampal-ai · ⭐ 51

    Outcome-based persistent memory MCP server for Claude Code and OpenCode. Good advice promoted, bad advice demo

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is ctxvault?

ctxvault is Local memory infrastructure for AI agents. Store knowledge and skills in isolated vaults you compose, control and query.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 60 GitHub stars.

What programming language is ctxvault written in?

ctxvault is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agentic-ai, ai-agents, chromadb.

How do I install or use ctxvault?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the ctxvault GitHub repository at github.com/Filippo-Venturini/ctxvault. The project has 60 stars and 10 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does ctxvault use?

ctxvault is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to ctxvault?

The top alternatives to ctxvault on Agent Skills Hub include oreilly-ai-agents, omega-memory, pdf-mcp. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools