by FlorianBruniaux · MCP Server · ★ 94
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
brew install ccboard
cargo install ccboardTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 94 |
| Forks | 8 |
| Language | Rust |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 72/100 |
| Open Issues | 20 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-01 |
| Created | 2026-02-02 |
| Platforms | browser, claude-code, cli, mcp, rust |
| Est. Tokens | ~31k |
ccboard A free, open-source TUI/Web dashboard for Claude Code session monitoring, cost tracking & config management <img src="https://i
Looking for a ccboard alternative? If you're comparing ccboard with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
10 Claude sessions running. What are they doing? Live dashboard — monitor, cost tracking, search, sub-agent vi
Ultra-fast token & cost tracker for LLM Token Usage (e.g. Claude Code)
Find, search, and resume local AI coding-agent sessions across Muse Code, Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity, Gro
htop for your AI costs — real-time terminal monitoring of LLM token usage and spending across providers and co
htop for your Claude Code sessions — real-time cost, cache efficiency, model comparison, and smart alerts
Automatic context preservation for Claude Code. Never lose work to compaction again. 7 hooks, 187 semantic pat
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: