by FrkAk · MCP Server · ★ 118
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
The agentic workspace where people and AI coding agents work together on every project.
| Stars | 118 |
| Forks | 8 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | AGPL-3.0 |
| Quality Score | 54.0431458849492/100 |
| Open Issues | 4 |
| Last Updated | 2026-06-30 |
| Created | 2026-04-06 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~13k |
These tools work well together with piyaz for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a piyaz alternative? If you're comparing piyaz with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
iOS development ClaudeCode plugin for mindful token and context usage. Contains modular MCPs that group variou
A personal context store for AI agents and assistants—reuse your existing coding agent CLI (Codex/Claude/OpenC
Claude Code LSP: enhance your Claude Code experience with non-IDE dependent LSP integration.
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) that allows Claude Desktop and other AI tools (Claude Code, Cursor, Antigravity
MCP tool: let you point at DOM elements for your favorite agentic coding tool. Let AI see what you see.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
piyaz is The agentic workspace where people and AI coding agents work together on every project.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 118 GitHub stars.
piyaz is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as agent-native, claude-code, claude-code-plugin.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the piyaz GitHub repository at github.com/FrkAk/piyaz. The project has 118 stars and 8 forks, indicating an active community.
piyaz is released under the AGPL-3.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to piyaz on Agent Skills Hub include claude-emporium, xclaude-plugin, OpenContext. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.