by Gentleman-Programming · MCP Server · ★ 1.7k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 1,679 |
| Forks | 254 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 61/100 |
| Open Issues | 464 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-05 |
| Created | 2026-05-10 |
| Platforms | mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
gentle-shell™ Your coding agent for controlled development in the workspace you lead. Website · Quickstart · Docs ·&nb
These tools work well together with gentle-shell for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a gentle-shell alternative? If you're comparing gentle-shell with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
The control plane for AI coding agents.
Use Claude and Antigravity with Pi, OpenCode and other coding clients. Local API bridge, usage dashboard and M
Development workflows for Claude Code that keep broad exploration focused on the outcome you approved.
55 rigorous skills for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode 1 and 2, and Pi: code review, security audit, feature deve
Local codebase intelligence CLI + MCP server for AI coding agents: SQLite code graph, 28 languages, 287 comman
Open-source AI coding agent and agent runtime: one binary, any model, MCP-native. Runs in terminal, CI, or as
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: