by GetStream · Agent Tool · ★ 205
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 205 |
| Forks | 63 |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 53/100 |
| Open Issues | 11 |
| Last Updated | 2025-01-23 |
| Created | 2022-07-02 |
| Est. Tokens | ~129k |
⚒️ The AI Agent Tools Catalog 🛠️ Discover a repository of tools to plug and play with your AI agents easily. Tools to read Hacker News ar
These tools work well together with ai-agent-tools-catalog for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a ai-agent-tools-catalog alternative? If you're comparing ai-agent-tools-catalog with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
An introduction to the world of AI Agents
Structured Data Extractor for AI Agents. Search your documents or the web for specific data and get it back in
Modular Python SDK and monorepo for AI agents, LLM integrations, tools, parsers, embeddings, vector stores, an
A simple and well-tailored LLM application framework that enables you to seamlessly integrate LLM capabilities
Agent samples built using the Strands Agents SDK.
Evo AI is an open-source platform for creating and managing AI agents, enabling integration with different AI
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: