Claude-code-leaks: Claude Code is an agentic coding tool that lives in your terminal, understands your codebase, and helps you

by GitHpriyanshu23 · Agent Tool · ★ 72

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 68/100

None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.

The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.

Quick Facts

Stars72
Forks110
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryAgent Tool
Quality Score68/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-03-31
Created2026-03-31
Platformsclaude-code, node
Est. Tokens~629k

About Claude-code-leaks

Note: The original unmodified leaked source is preserved in the backup branch. Claude Code - Leaked Source (2026-03-31) On March 31, 2026, the full source code of Anthropic's Claude Code CLI was leaked via a file exposed in their npm registry.

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with Claude-code-leaks for enhanced workflows:

  • fresh-start — semantic(0.77)+complementary+same_lang+shared_platform (60%)
  • claude-code — semantic(0.82)+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (55%)
  • Claude-code — semantic(0.62)+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (52%)
  • chatml — semantic(0.19)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (52%)

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools