by HagaiHen · MCP Server · ★ 3
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 3 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | HTML |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 64/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-11 |
| Created | 2026-10-08 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
Claude Code plugin that turns the podcasts you listen to on Spotify into a cited LLM wiki: one page per topic, every claim linked to its episode.
Looking for a podcast-wiki alternative? If you're comparing podcast-wiki with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Turn your markdown vault into a compounding knowledge wiki (Karpathy inspired). Six agent skills - knowledge g
Autonomous knowledge base plugin for Claude Code - captures reserch, ideas, and decisions into an interlinked
Modular Context | Karpathy LLM Knowledge Base + Gmail & G-Cal — multi-account MCP server for Claude Code, encr
A fast, open-source markdown editor. Graph view, plugin API, themes, Git/WebDAV sync, AI MCP — built on Tauri
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
A compounding LLM-wiki, best fit as a personal second brain that organizes and updates itself as it grows, zer
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: