Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 95 |
| Forks | 5 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 63/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-22 |
| Created | 2026-09-18 |
| Platforms | browser, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
JEV Case 收集全网优秀 JEV / TypeSafe case 的收藏库 | A curated collection of excellent JEV / TypeSafe cases from across the web. JEV Case 将 X 上公开分享的 JEV / TypeSafe 案例整理成可搜索、可筛选的静态案例墙。项目保留原帖入口、作者信息、互动指标、中文参考、引用关系与外部链接，方便集中浏览社区正在用 JEV 构建什么。 非官方社区项目，与 JEV / TypeSafe 无隶属关系。推文、视频、账号信息、封面和商标权利归原作者及原平台所有。 Features 202 条社区案例，支持热门、最新、视频优先、外链优先排序 按中文内容、引用帖和外链进行筛选 搜索作者、原文、译文、标签、提及和链接域名 案例详情页展示原帖、中文参考、互动指标、引用及转载关系...
These tools work well together with Jev-Case for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a Jev-Case alternative? If you're comparing Jev-Case with other ai tool tools, these 4 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
SciToolAgent: A Knowledge Graph-Driven Scientific Agent for Multi-Tool Integration
Skip to content github / docs Code Issues 80 Pull requests 35 Discussions Actions Projects 2 Security Insights
Skill to talk to Claude about your projects over the phone
.NET MAUI skills for GitHub Copilot and Claude Code
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: